![]() ![]() ![]() If you are developing a LiveReload server, see dist/livereload.js for the latest version built using the sources in this repository. It gets change notifications from a LiveReload server and applies them to the browser. This repository contains a JavaScript file implementing the client side of the LiveReload protocol. interested in hacking on livereload.js or want to understand it better.using a server that doesn't document the usage of livereload.js.When your server is running, you can typically access the script at. Most LiveReload server vendors will serve livereload.js on the LiveReload port. You should use the copy of livereload.js script bundled with your server, because it's guaranteed to be compatible, and may be customized for that server. If you are a web developer looking to use LiveReload, you should refer to your LiveReload server/app/tool's documentation, rather that this repository. you can even write your own refer to the LiveReload protocol.The server notifies the client whenever a change is made. When any other file is modified, the page is reloaded. When a CSS or an image file is modified, it is live-refreshed without reloading the page. The client connects to a LiveReload server via web sockets and listens for incoming change notifications. This repository (livereload.js) implements the client side of the protocol. To use LiveReload, you need a client (this script) in your browser and a server running on your development machine. They are NOT there to stamp their own peculiar style on every contribution.LiveReload is a tool for web developers and designers. What they are there for, in my view, and I thought in the view of others, was to ensure there was no vandalism, that the contributions were being made good faith constructively. They are unlikely even to have a consistent approach to the documentation between themselves. The gatekeepers are unlikely to be expert in every single aspect of the Spark, or of programming, or networking, or of style, or what constitutes good English. Rather than proposing wording changes to the submitter as a condition of acceptance, or quibbling about the approach taken by the submitter, or insisting that the submitter write a tutorial on the subject, just accept the proposed change if it constitutes a marginal improvement and then, if the accepter can see an obvious improvement, FIX IT, even if it means making big changes to the submission, just do it, as long as you’re sure you’re being constructive! Especially if the gatekeeper can do it in less time than entering into a debate. ![]() The gatekeepers who decide whether or not to accept a documentation submission should ask themselves this one simple question: “Is the documentation better or worse with this submission?” They should not be asking themselves “Is this the most ideal contribution there ever could be?” I want to propose another attitude in accepting documentation submissions. Actually just restarting the server seems to pick up the changes just fine as well since they are static resources. Running "coffeelint:grunt" (coffeelint) taskĬleaning build.Fatal error: watch EPERMĪfter I forced the process to end, and re-ran grunt build and grunt server it all came up just fine. > File "src\content\firmware.md" changed. Started connect web server on Running "watch" task Running "connect:livereload" (connect) task HERE YOU CAN SEE IS WHEN THE GRUNT SERVER COMMAND STARTED THE SERVER Then I updated firmware.md to test the live update feature, and got this error which I’m unsure about: The package.json doesn’t seems to call for all of that, so maybe grunt and assemble just need a ton of supporting packages? The new documentation setup is amazing! You whipped this up this weekend? Mad skillz!īTW I followed the setup guide and after the npm install part, it went ahead and downloaded like every package in existence it seems like.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |